Legal Opinion

Smith v. R. F. Brodegaard & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1948No. 32071PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The argument is made that the affidavit is defective because it fails to state positively any ground requiring bail, and any interest by the plaintiff in the property, and any possession by the defendant of the property. The contention is that the words in the affidavit, “the property of said plaintiff or in which he claims a valuable interest,” and “that the said property is now in the possession, custody or control of said defendant, and that he (the plaintiff) has reason to apprehend that said property has been or will be concealed or moved away, or will not be forthcoming to answer the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Dudley v. IslerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Ralls v. E. R. Taylor Auto CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. StrozierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Whitaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pinellas County v. WoolleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Phillips v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Uldrich v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. WeidnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API