People v. Onody
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
There was ample proof to sustain the defendant’s conviction under the second count based on subdivision 2 of section 483 of the Penal Law for having placed a child of eleven years in such a situation that her morals were likely to be impaired. The defendant contends that such a conclusion is in conflict with People v. Lindloff (259 App. Div. 749). We do not think the statute can be so narrowly construed as to exclude from its terms the indecent treatment to which the child was subjected in this case, and if the decision in the Lindloff case (supra) is to the contrary we disapprove it. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. . GibsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- People v. LindloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BergersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. BergersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- People v. CaslinNew York Court of Appeals · 1967