Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McGihon v. Cave

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA2462Published

1Concurrence

JUDGE FOX, specially concurring.

¶ 20 I concur with the majority's conclusion that article XXVIII, section 9(2)(a) of the Colorado Constitution did not authorize McGihon to seek enforcement of the ALJ's attorney fees order. I write separately to highlight the concession made during oral argument that neither Peck nor Cave challenges the validity of the ALJ's attorney fees order-only the enforcement, under article XXVIII, section 9(2)(a). Given this concession, in my view, Peck's apparent disregard for the ALJ's order-coupled with her failure to explain the apparent lack of effort to arrange to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. VerceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API