Legal Opinion

Mitchem v. Balkcom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1963No. 22021PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

In this State the common-law rule that the doctrine of res adjudicata does not extend to the trial of habeas corpus proceedings is not of force and such proceedings are subject to the provisions of Code § 110-501. See Andrews v. Aderhold, 201 Ga. 132 (2) (39 SE2d 61); and Wells v. Keith, 213 Ga. 858 (102 SE2d 533). The record in this case conclusively shows that the ground on which the applicant here relied for his release from the penitentiary was adjudicated adversely to him by a judgment rendered in a prior habeas corpus proceeding instituted by him against the respondent.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AderholdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Wells v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Ferguson v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Balkcom v. TownsendSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Balkcom v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  5. Board of Pardons & Paroles v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API