Legal Opinion

Buell v. Van Camp

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by George C. Buell and others against Benjamin F. Van Camp to recover a debt. An attachment was issued,which the court refused to vacate on motion of defendant, who appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

These are the same affidavits which we had before us on the appeal from an order in this action, in which our decision is reported in 6 N. Y. Supp. 365. There the motion was made in behalf of the Orleans County 17a-*208tional Bank, a subsequent lienor, who intervened in this action for the purpose of making such motion. On appeal, it was decided, among other things, that upon the hearing of that motion at special term the plaintiffs’ counsel should have been permitted to read an affidavit showing that the county judge, when he granted the warrant of attachment, actually had before him the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Alstyne v. . ErwineNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Buell v. Van CampNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Loeser v. RosmanNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API