Legal Opinion
Tackett v. Middleton
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1926No. 578-4397PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
The questions presented to us for disposition in this case involve primarily the construction of article 2, section 28, of the Charter of the City of Gainesville (Acts 31st Legislature, Special Laws, p. 501), which reads as follows:
“No contract shall be entered into until an appropriation has been made therefor, not in excess of the amount appropriated and all contracts, whenever practicable, shall be made upon specifications, and no contract shall be binding upon the city unless it has been signed by the mayor and the expense thereof charged to the proper appropriation, and whenever the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graves v. HornTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- McNeal v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Corpus Christi v. WoessnerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Hunter v. Whiteaker & WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Smith v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stevenson v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Stephens County v. J. N. McCammon, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- Austin Bros. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- West Audit Co. v. Yoakum CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- City of Big Spring v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.