Legal Opinion
Bergenholtz v. Cannata
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided August 17, 2006No. 05-05-01288-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice WHITTINGTON.
The trial judge granted appellees’ special appearance and dismissed appellants’ claims against them. In one issue, appellants contend the trial judge erred in ruling appellees are not subject to the trial court’s jurisdiction. We affirm the trial court’s order.
BACKGROUND
Therese Cannata, Alborg, Veiluva and Cannata, L.L.P. (“the Alborg firm”), Can-nata & Feldman, L.L.P. (“the Cannata firm”), and Geoff Spellberg are California lawyers and law firms who represented some or all of appellants in a California lawsuit in which appellants were sued by Interactive…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Laura Bryan v. Debora Coelho Gordon and Windermere Real Estate/Lane County, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Weldon-Francke v. Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC v. Safran Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Gordon & Doner, P.A. v. JorosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Johnson v. Kindred, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.