Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of Richmond

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 30, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

-Affirming in part and reversing in part.

The appellants and defendants below, J. M. Walker and others, are the owners as devisees of Joel J. Walker, deceased, of a parcel of land situated in the city of Richmond and fronting on Lancaster avenue a distance of 434.4 feet on its east side. By appropriate pleadings, the correctness of which is not questioned, the city reconstructed Lancaster avenue at a cost of one-third to the city and one-third to the property owners -on either side thereof,- and the cost against defendants’ property was assessed at $2,648.46,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. HalmhuberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Theophanis v. TheophanisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. City of Paducah v. Southern Roads Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API