Legal Opinion
Bank v. Kim
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 25, 2003PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
825 A.2d 566 (2003)
361 N.J. Super. 331
Cho Hung BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Ki Sung KIM and Kwi Ryung Kim, Defendants-Appellants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 14, 2003.
Decided June 25, 2003.
Robert A. Recio, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellants (Greiner, Gallagher & Cavanaugh, attorneys; Mr. Recio, on the brief).
Samuel Reiken, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondent.
Before Judges KESTIN,[1] FALL and LANDAU.
The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D., retired and temporarily assigned on recall.
This is an appeal from an order of the Chancery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re the Guardianship of J.N.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Marder v. Realty Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Patrick E. Catalano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Marder v. Realty Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Bank of New York v. RaftogianisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Emc Mortg. Corp. v. ChaudhriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Bascom Corp. v. CHASE MANHETTAN BANKNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Bank of New York v. LaksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.