Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Southern Nevada Power Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1954No. 3785PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

This appeal challenges the propriety of the trial court’s order under rule 41 (b) N. R. C. P. 1 granting defendant’s motion for dismissal and discharging the jury on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed.

Defendant power company installed its power line in what is referred to as a “dedicated alleyway” in the town of Goodsprings, Nevada. The poles were installed in the alley eighteen inches from the property line. An eight-foot crossarm, centered on the pole, resulted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Hayden v. Paramount Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Potomac Edison Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. Smith v. Odd Fellows Building Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Olson v. Cass County Electric Co-Operative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Foote v. Scott-New Madrid-Mississippi Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Jamerson v. WittOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Dorais v. PaquinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API