Hamilton v. Southern Nevada Power Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
This appeal challenges the propriety of the trial court’s order under rule 41 (b) N. R. C. P. 1 granting defendant’s motion for dismissal and discharging the jury on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed.
Defendant power company installed its power line in what is referred to as a “dedicated alleyway” in the town of Goodsprings, Nevada. The poles were installed in the alley eighteen inches from the property line. An eight-foot crossarm, centered on the pole, resulted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Hayden v. Paramount Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Potomac Edison Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Smith v. Odd Fellows Building Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Olson v. Cass County Electric Co-Operative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Foote v. Scott-New Madrid-Mississippi Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Jamerson v. WittOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Dorais v. PaquinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.