Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Coleman v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In this habeas corpus proceeding relator contends that the failure of the Board of Parole to afford him counsel at his final parole revocation hearing was a denial of due process and that the board’s order directing that he be held 18 months constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The record amply demonstrates that relator was given a full opportunity to have an attorney represent him at the hearing; was adequately informed of his right to have witnesses and the parole officer present; and that he knowingly waived these rights. Relator’s argument…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People ex rel. Lawrence v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. People ex rel. Clanton v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Martinez v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People ex rel. Brannaka v. HammackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API