Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. Wilcox

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1829PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The act in question must have a reasonable construction. If a particular officer were to be examined, whose *503name was unknown, (the Attorney General of a particular state, for instance, whose testimony might be material,) the commission might be issued generally, to take the testimony of that officer, without inserting his name.

In this case,' the defendant wishes to examine the clerks of the plaintiffs’, at Trieste, whose names are unknown to him. He sets forth by affidavit the facts which he wishes to prove, and asks either for a general commission to take the testimony of those clerks, or…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. United InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1800
  2. Forrest v. ForrestThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
  3. McColl v. Sun Mutual Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API