Legal Opinion

Humburg v. Namura

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court South Hilo, Hawaii.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

GALBRAITH, J.

The plaintiff filed an action of assumpsit in the District Court of South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, for the recovery of $96.00 alleged to be due from the defendants as rental for certain buildings held by them under lease. On the return day the parties appeared in court and the defendants’ attorney moved thg ppurt, as appears from the certificate of the District Magis*703trate, “that the hearing in this cause be postponed until after the bankruptcy cause of Tbmishima is settled in the Federal Court, before Judge Estee, at Honolulu, for the reason that this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barthrop v. Kona Coffee Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Grove v. BushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Titcomb v. NaeoleHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Republic of Hawaii v. PedroHawaii Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Hawaii Government Employees' Ass'n, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Harold Kainalu Long CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kalanianaole v. Liliuokalani ex rel. AndrewsHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lim v. Motor Supply, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Phillips v. ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API