Legal Opinion

Echeveria v. Nairac

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1801No. Case No. 4,261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TILGHMAN, Chief Judge.

This is the second term after issue joined. The defendant’s notice of a defence which was not expected, and which induced on the part of the plaintiff the necessity of a commission to La Vera Cruz, was given during October term last. It was certainly, very strict practice for the defendant to take a rule for trial or non pros, the very term he gave this notice; and had the plaintiffs resisted the rule under those circumstances, it might have been refused: but it was obtained as a matter of course, and we must dispose of it on proper principles. We are of opinion, on the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API