Legal Opinion
Ted Kelso v. Bayer Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 18, 2005No. 04-2532PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Ted Kelso sued Bayer Corporation for strict product liability, alleging that the warning Bayer provided on its Neo-Sy-nephrine 12 Hour Extra Moisturizing Spray was defective. The district court granted Bayer summary judgment. Kelso appeals. We affirm.
I
Ted Kelso began using Neo-Synephrine 12 Hour Extra Moisturizing Spray in 1990. He used Neo-Synephrine continuously for more than three years. After learning that his continued use of the product caused permanent nasal tissue damage requiring multiple sinus surgeries, he sued Bayer, the manufacturer of Neo-Syneph-rine,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- James R. Wilson v. Linda A. Giesen, County of LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Thompson v. BoggsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,688 Rodney Todd, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Tiffany Todd v. Societe Bic, S.A., and Bic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Daniel M. Williams v. Rep Corporation and Rep FranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Robinson v. McNeil Consumer HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. John LashayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Hernandez v. Schering Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- aaiPharma, Inc. v. Kremers Urban Development Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.