Legal Opinion

Walters v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. 06095374H; A134547PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the court erred in concluding that he was not entitled to immediate release from prison. As explained below, we conclude that the trial court correctly dismissed the writ. Accordingly, we affirm.

Plaintiff was convicted in 1981 of first-degree rape, for which he received a 15-year sentence. He was released on temporary leave in March 1987. In August 1987, while on leave, plaintiff was arrested for attempted first-degree kidnapping, attempted first-degree rape, and attempted first-degree sodomy. He was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Roof v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Meyrovich v. MaassDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Caughey v. MiddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. W. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API