Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. King

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2019No. 20180138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶1] Paul King appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of refusing to submit to chemical testing. King argues the district court erred in denying his request to give his proposed jury instructions, failing to give him an opportunity to object to the jury instructions, and allowing testimony about a preliminary screening test. We affirm.

I

[¶2] On July 1, 2017, Bismarck Police Officer Joseph Olsen stopped King's vehicle. Olsen testified he smelled the odor of alcohol coming from within the vehicle and King's eyes appeared to be red and glossy. King…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City of Fargo v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Jamestown v. SchultzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. City of Bismarck v. KingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. KrallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API