Crudup v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court, Ozark District. Jfphtha H. Evans, Judge. 1. The sheriff’s return is not upon a true copy of the order. It does not show: (1) Posting at the court house door; (2) printing in newspapers published in Arkansas; (3) that the posting and publishing was thirty days before the time fixed for presentations of warrants ; and (4) no proof of publication of publishers was filed as part of, or with, the returns.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court, Ozark District. Jfphtha H. Evans, Judge. 1. The sheriff’s return is not upon a true copy of the order. It does not show: (1) Posting at the court house door; (2) printing in newspapers published in Arkansas; (3) that the posting and publishing was thirty days before the time fixed for presentations of warrants ; and (4) no proof of publication of publishers was filed as part of, or with, the returns. Sand. & H. Dig. sec. 1004. 2. The amended return fails to show.that the posting and publishing was at least thirty days before the day fixed. 48 Ark. 238; 51…
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, C. J.
The appellant, being the holder of two certain warrants on the treasury of Franklin county, presented and tendered the same to the appellee, as collector of revenue of said county, in payment of certain county taxes assessed and charged against him, and appellee refused to accept the same. Appellant then sued out his writ in the Franklin circuit court to compel the acceptance of his said warrants in payment of said taxes. The appellee filed his response, setting up the previous order of the county court of said county debarring the holder- of said warrants from any benefit therefrom.
Validity…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lusk v. Perkins & GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baker v. YorkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898