City of Hattiesburg v. First Nat. Bank
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, District Judge.
A motion to remand this case has heretofore been overruled, after its consideration by the court upon lengthy briefs submitted by each side. (D. C.) 8 F. Supp. 157. In those briefs it was tacitly conceded that the ¿mount in controversy was sufficient to sustain- jurisdiction in this court, but counsel for the city have asked and obtained a rehearing for the purpose of urging that the amount does not exceed the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. Their contention is that the city seeks a several judgment for taxes against each shareholder of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Home Savings Bank v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Aberdeen Bank v. Chehalis CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.