Legal Opinion

City of Hattiesburg v. First Nat. Bank

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided January 25, 1935No. 7761Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, District Judge.

A motion to remand this case has heretofore been overruled, after its consideration by the court upon lengthy briefs submitted by each side. (D. C.) 8 F. Supp. 157. In those briefs it was tacitly conceded that the ¿mount in controversy was sufficient to sustain- jurisdiction in this court, but counsel for the city have asked and obtained a rehearing for the purpose of urging that the amount does not exceed the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. Their contention is that the city seeks a several judgment for taxes against each shareholder of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Home Savings Bank v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Aberdeen Bank v. Chehalis CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API