Norwood v. Bayshore Bus Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
On rehearing appellant strongly contends that this Court’s original judgment of affir-mance herein was erroneous:
*529(1) In that the permission to file the statement of facts beyond the period allowed by Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, is discretionary with the courts, instead of mandatory, as it held, citing Parks v. Purnell, 135 Tex. 182, 141 S.W.2d 585, by the Supreme Court of Texas as so holding.(2) That, notwithstanding the former holding to the contrary, the record herein does reflect sufficient facts, by way of admissions and statements made in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parks v. PurnellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Winters v. BethuneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Jennings v. FredericksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Home Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. StricklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941