Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Marion

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1936No. Civ. No. 10717PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

This suit, directed against a township justice of the peace, seeks damages upon allegations that the latter maliciously and without probable cause, and knowing that the complaint and affidavit for arrest were false, issued a warrant for plaintiff’s arrest and thereby caused the latter’s unlawful imprisonment. Demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment which followed.

The lower court ruled correctly. The law grants to a judicial officer immunity from civil actions by persons dissatisfied with his judicial determinations. Cooley on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffith v. SlinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Pearson v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Ceinar v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huendling v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Huendling v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API