Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Dobbs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 15, 2004No. SCBD-4634, OBAD-1496PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2004 OK 46
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant,
v.
JAMES MARK DOBBS, Respondent.
Nos. SCBD-4634, OBAD-1496
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
June 15, 2004
Mike Speegle, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Complainant.
Gary Rife, RIFE & WALTERS, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Respondent.
OPALA, V.C.J.
¶1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition?[1]…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re SpilmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- In Re the Reinstatement of DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- Spilman v. Oklahoma Bar Assoc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.