Legal Opinion

People v. James

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Mem*980orandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Supreme Court for a reconstruction hearing on the issue whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing (People v James, 245 AD2d 1115). The record of the reconstruction hearing supports the court’s determination that the Sandoval hearing was held outside of defendant’s presence (see, People v Evans, 232 AD2d 424, lv denied 89 NY2d 921). Because the Sandoval ruling was not entirely in defendant’s favor, the judgment of conviction must be reversed (see, People v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milland v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. PitsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. PitsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API