Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 7, 1977No. Y-77-0387PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Defendants James E. Howard and Theodore Hartzog have moved to dismiss the indictment, or in the alternative for release from custody pending trial. The basis for their motions is that the date of their trial, now scheduled for November 14, 1977, is not within the time limits of the Federal Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., or the local court rules for the District of Maryland. The defendants are among eight co-defendants charged with conspiring to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- United States v. McArthur Edwards, AKA Edwards McArthur and Charles Darnell WardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. William Brainer, Eugene Gressman, Esq., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- In Interest of KupperionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.