Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Dunn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

The defendant was an endorser upon a note made by one Jimmerson and held by the plaintiffs. Upon the trial of the present action, brought against Dunn by the bank, it was. set up that the bank had agreed with Jimmerson, the maker of the note, without the consent of Dunn, the endorser, to extend the time of payment of the note.

It appears in the case that the bank had held a large quantity of Jimmerson’s paper, and had taken as collateral security a mortgage upon certain real estate which belonged to Jimmerson’s wife. This mortgage was subject to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shreve v. CrosbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  2. Loria's Garage, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Albert Lifson & Sons, Inc. v. WilliamsUnited States District Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API