Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Unangst

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1932No. 41094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

We find it necessary to decide but one question, and that is whether plaintiff has made a case for the jury on her claim to an implied contract with decedent for the services and board for which she seeks to recover. She pleads that the board and services were rendered under an implied contract with decedent that she would receive reasonable compensation therefor. The claim is in six items in the same form, the first from September 7, 1912, to September 7, 1917, 250 weeks, “for care, washing, ironing, mending, and board of George W. Unangst at $3 per week $750; ’ ’ the second from September…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. In Re Estate of NewsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Mewhirter v. HattenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Snyder v. NixonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Wilson v. ElseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinift v. SiniftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Maasdam v. Estate of MaasdamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Shoberg v. RockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. In Re Estate of DociusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Snell v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API