Brown v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRoberts, J.
¶ 19. While I agree with the majority’s finding that the statutory time and subsequent-writ bars prohibit granting Brown relief under Mississippi’s PCR statute, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s gratuitous assertions in regard to Brown’s standing to file his PCR motion. I am compelled to clarify my points of concern and dissent from the standing analysis.
¶ 20. It is important to note that in the majority’s opinion, it finds Brown does not have standing to file his PCR motion.2 If a petitioner lacks standing to file a PCR motion, the circuit court and ultimately this Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
- Pruitt v. Hancock Medical CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Putnam v. EppsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
- Winborn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.