Legal Opinion

Francis v. . N.Y. B. El. R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole question in this case is whether the offer to return the stock certificates was sufficient to enable the plaintiff to rescind; and that inquiry turns in the end upon the effect of those certificates as a transfer of the stock. The certificates are not the stock, but the evidence of its ownership. When the plaintiff accepted the stock in consideration of the rights which he transferred, that stock became his, and the certificate given him was the company's acknowledgment of that ownership. After receiving it he could transfer the stock to whom he pleased. He did transfer it, formally,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. In re the Estate of BabcockNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  3. I.C. v. Delta Galil USADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. CatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Clemens v. Press Pub. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API