Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Nome & Sinook Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 28, 1931No. Gen. No. 34,120PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant in an action on promissory notes. The court sustained a demurrer to a replication to each of two pleas, and the plaintiff having elected to stand by her replications, judgment was entered for the defendant.

The undisputed facts disclose that four notes aggregating $12,000 and bearing interest at 6 per cent per annum were given by the defendant in 1903 and 1904, made payable at sundry dates in 1904. Plaintiff commenced her suit by filing a narr. and cog. July 22, 1925, on which judgment was entered by confession. Subsequently leave…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Hamilton v. North Pac. S. S. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hubbard v. United States Mortgage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1883
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. SloanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
  5. Warren v. ClemengerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bernard Food Industries, Inc. v. The Dietene CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. Eva Seymour v. The Union News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Nelson v. RichardsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  4. LeBlanc v. G.D. Searle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Hollins v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API