Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Glasscock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1993No. 822Published

1ConcurrenceStephenson, Judge

I agree that R.C. 2947.14 is neither applicable to, nor dispositive of, the issue presented in the cause sub judice. I am also in agreement with the ultimate judgment of the majority opinion as well as much of the sound reasoning by which that result was reached. I write separately, however, because I believe our ruling that indigent defendants may be ordered to perform community service in payment of their fines should be grounded in some sort of statutory authority.

To that end, I would note the provisions of R.C. 2929.51(F) which specify that when a fine is imposed the court may (1) suspend…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. BalasOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API