State v. Glasscock
Ohio Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceStephenson, Judge
I agree that R.C. 2947.14 is neither applicable to, nor dispositive of, the issue presented in the cause sub judice. I am also in agreement with the ultimate judgment of the majority opinion as well as much of the sound reasoning by which that result was reached. I write separately, however, because I believe our ruling that indigent defendants may be ordered to perform community service in payment of their fines should be grounded in some sort of statutory authority.
To that end, I would note the provisions of R.C. 2929.51(F) which specify that when a fine is imposed the court may (1) suspend…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Akron v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. BalasOhio Court of Appeals · 1990