Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Kahl v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1936Published

1Dissent

McNamee, J. (dissenting).

The claimant was a common laborer, and the Industrial Board so found. His employment was intermittent during the year preceding his injury, for he worked off and on only fifty-seven days, earning fifty cents an hour a part of the time and seventy-five cents an hour at other times. Twice he refused steady jobs because he did not wish to complicate the social relations of his wife. He earned as a laborer during the year $293.44; but the Board, under subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and upon proof of the earnings of another worker,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Ruppert v. Plattdeutsche Volksfest VereinNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Claim of Orlando v. Snider Packing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Claim of Phillips v. New York Trap Rock Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API