Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 28, 1992PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Per curiam

In State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 586 A.2d 85 (1991) (Marshall I), this Court affirmed defendant’s conviction for the murder of his wife and the resulting sentence of death. This appeal requires us to resolve the “proportionality” issue reserved in that case. Id. at 170, 586 A.2d 85. The Capital Punishment Act provides that on the “request of the defendant, the Supreme Court shall * * * determine whether the [death] sentence [imposed on a defendant convicted of capital murder] is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant.” N.J.S.A.…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Lester v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API