Legal Opinion
Penato v. George
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 22, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action, inter alia, for an accounting and to recover damages for tortious interference with contractual rights, plaintiffs appeal (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Baker, J.), entered April 14, 1980, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of defendants on the causes of action for an accounting and to recover damages for tortious interference with contractual rights, and (2) from an order of the same court (Hyman, J.), dated March 20, 1980, which granted the motion of defendants Sanford Machine Co., Inc., Textured Products,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Schantz v. . OakmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Penato v. GeorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pressman v. Estate of SteinvorthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Byrd v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Parola v. Lido Beach Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- McGregor v. McGregorNew York Supreme Court · 2017