Legal Opinion
Brannon v. Adult & Family Services Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 26, 1996No. 2-3501-BX6933-9; CA A85201PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Claimant appeals from an order of a hearings officer that upheld a decision of the Adult and Family Services Division to deny claimant benefits under the Oregon Health Plan (OHP). Claimant argues that the rule under which her benefits were denied, OAR 461-135-1100(4),1 is inconsistent with certain provisions of state and federal law. OAR 461-135-1100(4) denies OHP benefits to people who are denied cash benefits under the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) program because they have been disqualified from that program for failure to participate in the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GarzaOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Stenson v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Jackson v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Price v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011