Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1994No. 350-94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury found Appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault and the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for forty years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Tompkins v. State, 869 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.App.—Eastland 1994). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review in which he alleged the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial.

After further review of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that Appellant’s petition was improvidently…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tompkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. State v. Balderas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. Eddie Guadalupe Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API