Legal Opinion

Haynie v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1968No. 43460Published

1Opinion of the Court

117 Ga. App. 766 (1968)

162 S.E.2d 27

HAYNIE

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA et al.

43460.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Argued February 5, 1968.

Decided May 10, 1968.

Sanders, Mottola & Haugen, A. Burt Rutledge, for appellant.

Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr., McChesney H. Jeffries, Holcombe Green, Robert B. Harris, R. J. Armstrong, for appellees.

EBERHARDT, Judge.

1. In resolving this question we must consider whether the contract of guaranty was entire or severable. If it was entire, as will be seen from the discussion that follows, there could be no revocation. If it was…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Whitman; Concurrence · Felton.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. Benefield v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Broxton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API