Legal Opinion

Lutz v. District Court of the First Judicial District

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1906No. 1698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original proceeding. Certiorari by Martin Lutz to review an order made by Hon. M. A. Murphy, District Judge of the First Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Ormsby County, committing petitioner to jail until he complied with an order requiring him to make certain payments of alimony and suit money to his wife for the prosecution of a divorce case. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Fitzgerald, C. J.:

This is a proceeding in certiorari. Petitioner herein was defendant in a divorce suit in the court below, Said court made an order that he pay for the benefit of his wife, the plaintiff in the said divorce suit, the sum of $150 for attorney’s fees, $100 for costs of suit, and $35 a month alimony pendente lite. Petitioner, failing to make said payments, was cited by the court to appear and show cause why he should not be punished for contempt of court. He appeared and as cause *153and excuse for his failure to make the payments set up his inability to make the same.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Batchelder v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Phillips v. WelchNevada Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Ex parte GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Watson v. WatsonUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cline v. LanganNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Awad v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Steeves v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API