Legal Opinion

Tyng v. Constant-Loraine Investment Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1910No. 2058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Co-urt, Third District; Hon. Geo. T. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Charles Tyng against Oonstant-Loraine Investment Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.

R. A. Rowan, of Los Angeles, Cal., the president of the Oonstant-Loraine Investment Company, a corporation, also of that city, in December, 1905, conveyed to it by warranty deed a parcel of ground fifty-three and one-half feet by one hundred' and sixty-five feet situate on the west side of State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, and in the same deed quit-claimed to it a strip one and one-half feet by one hundred and sixty-five feet adjoining the fifty-three and one-half feet on the south. .The title so conveyed to the company was all the title held by Rowan. The stripi quitclaimed was occupied…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Bank of Beaver County v. HollingsheadUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harras v. HarrasWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Tyng v. Constant-Loraine Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tyng v. Constant-Loraine Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API