Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vaile v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2002No. 36969Published

1Dissent

Young, L, with whom Shearing, J., agrees,

dissenting:

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the decree of divorce is voidable, not void; and I also disagree with the majority that Cisilie is judicially estopped from questioning the decree obtained through Scotlund’s fraud.

*2841. The decree of divorce is void, not voidable

In the majority opinion, my colleagues hold that the decree fraudulently obtained by Scotlund without establishing residency is voidable, not void. This holding is contrary to long-established law in this state and undermines Nevada’s statutory scheme requiring a six-week…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Bobby Ray McCaskey A/K/A Snake and Lionel Legard A/K/A MaxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. John S. Clark Company v. Faggert & Frieden, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. New Lamp Chimney Co. v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API