Legal Opinion
United States v. Konigsberg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 13, 1964No. Nos. 14563-14567PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Konigsberg, Nalewajka, Ju-liano and Celso were indicted, tried and convicted of unlawful possession of goods stolen from interstate commerce in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 659. Appellant Zax was indicted, tried and convicted of unlawful concealment of goods valued in excess of $5,000 which had been stolen from interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2315.
Appellants argue that they had standing to move for the suppression of evidence, to object to its introduction and that the evidence should have been suppressed.
The case centers around the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. BilderbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Frank A. Niro, Jr. v. United States of America, Edward M. Glynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.