Legal Opinion
Rudolf v. Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 4, 2005No. 5D04-368PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, W., J.
Appellants, the plaintiffs-physicians below,1 appeal from a final summary judgment entered against them after they filed a shareholder derivative action for legal malpractice against Gray Harris & Robinson, P.A. (Gray-Harris), based on claims that the law firm had a conflict of interest *149between them, as individual shareholders, and the corporation in which they held shares, and which Gray-Harris represented, and breach of fiduciary duties by failing to advise them of their legal rights and options.2 We affirm.
Appellants were physician-shareholders of Anesthesiologists of Central…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Brennan v. RuffnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Bruckner v. City of Dania BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Adams v. ChenowithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palafrugell Holdings, Inc. v. CasselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Razin v. A Milestone, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Williams v. StanfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008