Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Pidcock

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by the plaintiffs, as surviving partners, for the amount of a judgment recovered by the partnership, in the court of another State, for the wrongful conversion of two locomotives. The answer was a subsequent discharge in bankruptcy. .

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is by plaintiffs, surviving partners, to recover the sum of $14,315.56, being the amount of a judgment recovered by the partnership in the Supreme Court of the State of Hew "Jersey, for the wrongful conversion of two locomotives. The defendant pleads a subsequent discharge in bankruptcy.

Section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act provides that “ a discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from aE of his provable debts except such as * * * (2) are judgments in actions for frauds, or obtaining property by false pretenses or false representations, or for willful and malicious injuries to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Comstock v. GroutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bever v. SweckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Walker Bros. v. Capital City Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. HudsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1901
  4. In re ColeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API