Legal Opinion
Klott v. Chapman
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 13, 1961No. Civ. No. 1274PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, District Judge.
This is an action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff when the defendants’ automobile collided with the rear end of the trailer and automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger.
In Rhetorical Paragraph Five of the complaint the plaintiff alleges:
“That it was the duty and obligation of the defendants herein, in the operation of their motor vehicle upon a public highway, to observe and obey the State of Tennessee Motor Vehicle Code and Ordinances of the City of Chapel Hill, in which city said accident occurred, and the common law…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Little v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Courteau v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1940
- Kingsul Theatres, Inc. v. QuillenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
- Downey v. BankerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Francis C. O'Neill and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States v. Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation, Third-Party Francis C. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969