State v. Lehman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BELT J.
Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted in Washington County of having sold intoxicating liquor. A few days before trial it ivas ascertained that the alleged crime was committed about 900 feet from the boundary line of Washington County and within Clackamas County. At time of arrest the exact location of the boundary line was not known by the officers.
Defendant asserts that the court had no jurisdiction of the crime since, from the undisputed evidence, it was committed, if at all, in Clackamas County.
The State relied upon Section 1385, Or. L., which provides:
“When a crime is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CostleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Brown v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Commonwealth v. MatthewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Ryan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. DepecheCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SwainstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. McCownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.