State v. Ward
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.
A decade ago the General Assembly, recognizing the considerable discrepancy in imposing punishment upon conviction of criminal offenses, appreciating the need for reasonable uniformity in sentencing practices, and aware of the problems arising from sentence disparity, 1 enacted legislation to alleviate the situation. Chapter 288, Acts 1966, by legislative direction to be implemented by appropriate rules of procedure promulgated by the Court of Appeals, established a procedure for review of criminal sentences. As subsequently amended the statute is now codified as Art. 27, §§ 645JA-645JG 2 and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Dotson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Rendelman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.