Legal Opinion

Pio Costa v. Borough of Riverdale

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided June 19, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KUSKIN, J.T.C.

Plaintiff appeals the disallowance by defendant Borough of Riverdale’s tax assessor of farmland assessment qualification for plaintiffs twenty-five acres of woodlands. The property is designated as Block 36.01, Lot 14 on the Borough tax map. The tax years in issue are 1999, 2000, and 2001. For the reasons set forth below, I hold that the disallowance was proper.

Plaintiffs appeals were the subject of a plenary trial. The following factual findings and legal conclusions are based upon my weighing and analyzing the evidence, my determinations as to the credibility of the witnesses,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Franklin Estates, Inc. v. Tp. of EdisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Franklin Estates, Inc. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Miele v. Township of JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Wishnick v. Upper Freehold TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
  5. Estell Manor City v. SternNew Jersey Tax Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chemical New Jersey Holdings, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
  2. Alexandria Township v. OrbanNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API