Bell & Marra, PLLC v. Sullivan
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 Gordon Sullivan appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of Summary Judgment in favor of Bell & Marra, pile, entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. Bell & Marra cross-appeals from the District Court’s determination of the amount of attorney fees contained in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of Summary Judgment. We reverse and remand.
¶2 The dispositive issue raised by Sullivan on appeal is as follows:
¶3 1. Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judg-
ment in favor of Bell & Marra?
¶4 One issue is raised by Bell &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Ausler v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Campbell v. Bozeman Investors of DuluthMontana Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yarbro, Ltd. v. Missoula Federal Credit UnionMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Prestige Imports, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Bell Marra v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Blanco Matos v. Colón MuleroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.