Legal Opinion
People v. Bruckman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict as returned by the jury, his claim of repugnancy was not preserved for appellate review. (See People v Parks, 59 AD2d 543, 544; People v Incherchera, 56 AD2d 852; cf. Matter of Oliver v Justices of N. Y. Supreme Ct. of N. Y. County, 36 NY2d 53, 58; People v Quilles, 48 AD2d 933.)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oliver v. Justices of the New York Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- People v. QuillesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- People v. InchercheraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. StahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. McDavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.