Legal Opinion

State v. Culbreath

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Ouachita- Circuit Court. Charles W. Smith, Judge. The indictment was sufficient. Sand. & H. Dig. § 1784; 31 Ark. 676. The conclusion “contra formam staiuti” is not necessary. Sand. & H. Dig. §§ 2075, 2076, 2087, 2091; 19 Ark. 613; 66 Ark. 65.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, C. J.

This is an indictment for malicious mischief, in the Ouachita circuit court, and it reads as follows, to-wit: “The grand jury of Ouachita county, in the name and by the authority of the state of Arkansas, on oath, accuse Ed. Culbreath of the crime of malicious mischief, committed as follows, to-wit: The said defendant, on the 28th day of October, 1901, in Ouachita county, Arkansas, did unlawfully and wilfully pull down the fence of certain enclosed grounds belonging to one John S. Beard, without the consent of the said John S. Beard, against the peace and dignity of the state of Arkansas.”

To…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  2. State v. CadleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Speer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. State v. SchnellMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Faber v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Lyman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Merrill v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API