Smith v. Rudolph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurrence
Friedman, J.P.
(concurring). In view of the unusually egregious and pervasive misconduct of defense counsel at trial, as described in the majority opinion, I concur in the affirmance of the order granting plaintiff a new trial, notwithstanding her counsel’s failure to move for an order declaring a mistrial before the verdict was rendered. I write separately, however, to note that our disposition of this appeal should not be construed as a retreat from the general principle that a party who fails to move for a mistrial before the case is submitted to the fact-finder, in spite of being aware of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Califano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Schein v. Chest Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Boyd v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Heller v. Louis Provenzano, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Bertram v. Columbia Presbyterian/New York Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015