Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Smith v. Rudolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 2017No. 302983/09 2950Published

1Concurrence

Friedman, J.P.

(concurring). In view of the unusually egregious and pervasive misconduct of defense counsel at trial, as described in the majority opinion, I concur in the affirmance of the order granting plaintiff a new trial, notwithstanding her counsel’s failure to move for an order declaring a mistrial before the verdict was rendered. I write separately, however, to note that our disposition of this appeal should not be construed as a retreat from the general principle that a party who fails to move for a mistrial before the case is submitted to the fact-finder, in spite of being aware of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Califano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Schein v. Chest Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Boyd v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Heller v. Louis Provenzano, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Bertram v. Columbia Presbyterian/New York Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API